Padilla Fires Back at ICC Over Duterte Hearing Controversy
ROBIN PADILLA – Senator Robin Padilla did not hold back as he publicly questioned the credibility of ICC prosecutors, even asking them directly, Nag-aaral ba kayo ng batas?
Senator Robin Padilla recently questioned the credibility of prosecutors from the International Criminal Court (ICC) following developments in the case involving former President Rodrigo Duterte.
Padilla aired his criticism after the ICC opposed waiving Duterte’s right to attend the scheduled hearing related to the confirmation of charges against him. The issue quickly drew attention, especially among Duterte’s supporters and critics, as it touched on the former president’s legal rights and the court’s procedures.
During an online interview on Friday, February 20, Padilla stressed what he believes to be Duterte’s right to make such an appeal. Expressing frustration, the senator directly questioned the prosecution’s understanding of the law.
“E, karapatan ng accused ‘yon. Akala ko ba itong prosecution e…nag-aaral ba kayo ng batas?” said Padilla.
He continued by emphasizing what he described as a fundamental human right of the accused, particularly considering Duterte’s age.
“Karapatan ng accused ‘yon kung ayaw niyang humarap e lalong-lalo na matanda na siya. Karapatan niya ‘yon, human rights.”
Padilla also alleged that if Duterte were to appear before the hearing, it might only result in making the former president look like a subject of ridicule.
“E, naku! Alam na ho natin ‘yon,” the senador added.
The senator’s remarks added fuel to the ongoing debate surrounding the ICC proceedings and Duterte’s participation. Supporters argue that the former leader’s rights must be respected, while critics maintain that due process must take its course under international law.
However, as of this writing, the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I has already granted permission for Duterte to attend the entire hearing. The proceedings are set to begin on February 23 and are scheduled to conclude on February 27.
The development marks a significant turn in the case, as attention now shifts to the upcoming hearing and how both the prosecution and defense will present their arguments before the international tribunal.